THE MOUNT RENNIE OUTRAGE CASE
Today let’s hear about “ THE MOUNT RENNIE OUTRAGE CASE”
Sydney, November twenty-eight.
After an extended hearing of the Mount Rennie outrage case.
It was delivered to a detailed at the Central court shortly before midnight last night.
The court weekday till half-past three o’clock yesterday morning.
When Mr. Teece replied for the Crown and severely criticized the proof brought forward for the defense.
It then adjourned till nine o’clock when the judge commenced his rundown and spoke for ten hours.
Not concluding till twenty minutes past eight o’clock within the evening.
His address was the most lucid and skilled one.
He carefully and thoroughly went through and analyzed the proof professionally.
And placed very little credence on the testimony brought forward in favor of the prisoners.
He spoke powerfully in favor of the proof given by the lady Hicks.
At 8.20 p.m.the jury retired, and at 5 minutes past11 o’clock came back.
With a finding of fact of guilty against Wm. Hill, Geo. Duffy, Wm. Newman, Michael Donnellan, JosephMartin, Wm.
Boyce, Hugh Miller, Robert G. Read, and George Keegan, and guiltless against Thomas Oscroft and Michael Mangan.
They counseled the convicted prisoners to mercy on account of their youth.
THE MOUNT RENNIE OUTRAGE CASE
In answer to the standard question, Hill, Donnellan, Boyce, Keegan, Millar (sic), and Read, protested.
Their innocence, Duffy and Newman had nothing to say.
And Martin aforementioned “That lady was a consenting party.”
His Honor then in the most spectacular manner proceeded to pass the sentence of death on every one of the 9prisoners.
Holding out no hope of mercy.
Sydney, November twenty-nine.
At the Central court today Charles Sweetman, a cabman, was arraigned on a charge of getting, at Water-loo.
On Sep nine, molested one Motherjane Hicks, with intent, to commit rape.
Mr. Teece prosecuted, and also the unfortunate was vulnerable.
It’ll be remembered that Sweetman was the cabby United Nations agency that drove the lady Hicks.
The victim of the mount Rennie outrage, to the scene, and the proof adduced showed that he had driven.
Her to a lonely spot, and then entering the cab tried liberties with her.
Once the opposite men came up and took her away,.
whereat he drove away and failed to offer data to the police.
The jury came back with a finding of fact of guilty.
The unfortunate created an announcement denying he created any try on the lady.
Mr. Justice Windeyer, en passant sentence, aforementioned that had.
It not been for the action of the unfortunate the frightful outrage.
which had occupied the eye of the court for the last week wouldn’t have occurred.
He spoke powerfully on the cowardly conduct of the unfortunate,.
And sentenced him to fourteen years penal servitude, and to be flogged on the twentieth of December.
And also the first of April next, 25lashes to be inflicted on every occasion.
The unfortunate, he said, appeared to not be a strong man or he would have ordered more strokes.
It is explicit that a brother of 1 of the men condemned to death for participation.
In the outrage has been threatening violence to 1 of the Crown’s witnesses.
And that a warrant has been issued for his arrest.
So that’s all about “THE MOUNT RENNIE OUTRAGE CASE”
- I always love and like to write down articles that are useful to update our knowledge regarding WOMEN SAFETY
- And most significantly don’t forget to subscribe to my website womensafetyinfo.com
- So that you’ll get the notification whenever I upload a new post related to “WOMEN SAFETY“. in particular,.
So I request you to stay updated with us.
- If you find my posts useful, Do Share these posts with your Friends and Family
- Have Questions? be happy to contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org
- To see some interesting information about SPACE EXPLORATION also check Mr.OUTER SPACE